Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 397 result(s)
March 8, 2017

The case involved a labor law dispute between a football player and his club, whereby the CAS (Lars Hilliger chairing with arbitrators, Efraïm Barak and Stuart McInnes), partially confirming the FIFA DRC Decision, ordered the club to pay the unpaid salaries to the player.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_40/2017
Original language: 
French
Published: 
36 ASA Bull 172 (2018)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
February 7, 2017

It deals with the recurrent issue of jurisdiction, yet this time not the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) but rather of the previous instance (in casu the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber, DRC).

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_492/2016
Original language: 
German
Published: 
35 ASA Bull 452 (2017)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
May 7, 2019

The opinion is very interesting since it deals, among other issues, with the distinction between domestic and international arbitration and the exact conditions for opting out of the review system of the Swiss Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) for the more restrictive appeal conditions foreseen in Article 190 (2) of the Swiss Private International Law Act (PILA).

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_540/2018
Original language: 
French
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
October 28, 2019

The background case involves the celebrity swimmer Sun Yang, who was accused of an anti-doping rule violation due to unsuccessful attempt to take blood and urine samples during an unannounced doping control at his house and the subsequent lifting of charges by the FINA Anti-Doping Commission.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_413/2019
Original language: 
French
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
October 4, 2017

The case involved an international-level middle-distance runner (the Athlete) whose antidoping controls showed the highly likely use of a prohibited substance or method. Following a provisional suspension in April 2016, the Athlete was suspended for four years. The decision with grounds was part of the minutes of the meeting of the Federation’s Disciplinary Commission in June 2016.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_384/2017
Original language: 
French
Published: 
36 ASA Bull 197 (2018)
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
January 6, 2020

In this overly publicized and quite interesting case, involving the Chinese Swimmer Sun Yang (the Athlete) and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the Athlete was accused of an antidoping rule violation due to the unsuccessful attempt to take blood and urine samples during an unannounced test carried out at the Athlete’s home in September 2018. Even though the Swimmer was cleared by his federation’s (i.e.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_287/2019
Original language: 
French
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
June 19, 2019

The arbitration at issue concerned a joint-venture partnership between the Claimant, a Turkish company in the energy field, and the Respondent, a Spanish company. The partnership was intended to explore the construction and operation of seven hydropower plants in Turkey and was governed by a series of agreements between the parties, including a Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”). 

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_628/2018
Original language: 
German
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 

Pages