Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 96 result(s)
April 24, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_43/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
April 28, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_112/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
August 27, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_441/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
August 28, 2014

The case involved a decision of the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber (“DRC”) ordering a player and his club jointly to pay an amount of £400’000 to the Claimant because the player had been hired in breach of the relevant FIFA regulation on the transfer of players. Both joint Defendants appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) but the Player failed to pay the advance of costs and his appeal was deemed withdrawn and consequently struck out.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_6/2014
Original language: 
French
Published: 
33 ASA Bull 85 (2015), ATF 140 III 520
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
October 6, 2015

Although the Federal Tribunal did its best to “anonymize” the judgment, it is immediately apparent that it involved the dispute between Eléctricité de France (EDF) International SA and the Republic of Hungary.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_34/2015
Original language: 
French
Published: 
ATF 141 III 495
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
February 26, 2015

The case involved a dispute between a Mexican football club and some Argentine coaches. In 2009, they entered into an employment contract with the club and the contract had dispute resolution clause, yet confusingly providing for jurisdiction of a state court as well as jurisdiction of the Mexican Football Federation.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_374/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
January 6, 2016

The case involved an investment agreement between a French company and a Spanish company. The contract was governed by Spanish law and provided for ICC arbitration in Geneva.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_572/2015
Original language: 
French
Published: 
34 ASA Bull 171 (2016)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
March 16, 2015

The case involved a dredging contract between a Russian company and its Luxembourg counterpart, pursuant to which the Luxembourg company undertook to deliver 2 million cubic meters of a mixture of sand and gravel. The contract contained an arbitration clause providing for ICC arbitration in Geneva and was governed by English law.

A dispute arose and, after terminating the contract, the Luxembourg company sought damages.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_636/2014
Original language: 
German
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
May 6, 2015

The case involved a contractual clause by which a club was entitled to obtain an additional amount should a professional football player be transferred in the future.

 

A dispute arose and the single judge of the Players’ Status Committee of FIFA denied the claim in a decision issued in March 2012, which was then appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_426/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
May 21, 2015

The case involved a general contractor’s agreement between a Swiss and a Luxembourg company for the renovation of an apartment building in Switzerland. The contract was governed by Swiss law and contained an arbitration clause which, interestingly, appointed the architect of the project as sole arbitrator.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_709/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
December 10, 2015

The matter involved an Argentinian player who entered into a contract with two players’ agents in Argentina and then unilaterally terminated the contract.

 

The agents sued in the Court of Arbitration for Sport, which had jurisdiction pursuant to an arbitration clause in the contract. The CAS Panel (chairman José Juan Pinto with arbitrators Riccardo de Buen and Hernan Ferrari) essentially upheld the claim but only awarded EUR 1 million instead of the EUR 3 million claimed.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_568/2015
Original language: 
German
Published: 
34 ASA Bull 178 (2016)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
May 21, 2015

In a dispute between an Italian football club and an English company based on the acquisition by the English company of the economic rights of an Argentine professional football player, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) accepted jurisdiction and its Panel (chairman Ricardo de Buen, with arbitrators José Juan Pinto and Massimo Coccia) awarded the English company an amount of EUR 9’400’000, which was then challenged in the Federal Tribunal by way of a Civil law appeal.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_634/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
February 25, 2016

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_492/2015
Original language: 
German
Published: 
ATF 142 III 230
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
February 25, 2016

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_490/2015
Original language: 
German
Published: 
ATF 142 III 230
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
June 3, 2015

The case involved a dispute between a Dutch foundation, an American company and various other players, arising from an investment agreement allegedly breached by one of the parties. The state court in California was seized first and this produced a default judgment in 2007 ordering the restitution of the amount invested and awarding punitive damages.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_676/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 

Pages