Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 5 result(s)
October 21, 2009

Under Swiss law, a judgment of the Federal Tribunal - or of any other court - can be the object of a request that it should be clarified or rectified whenever its holding is unclear, incomplete or ambiguous.

Case information

Docket number: 
4G_2/2009
Original language: 
German
Published: 
28 ASA Bull 668 (2010)
also see 3 SwissIntArbRep 483 (2009)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Arbitrator (s): 
June 9, 2009

On November 6, 2001, INFRONT SPORT AND MEDIA AG (“INFRONT”), a Swiss company specializing in the marketing of advertising rights in the field of sports and the Belarus Football Federation (“BFF”) entered into a contract giving INFRONT certain broadcasting and advertising rights for the home plays of the national Belarus football team between 2002 and 2007.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_94/2009
Original language: 
German
Published: 
28 ASA Bull 352 (2010)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Arbitrator (s): 
October 11, 2012

At issue was a dispute between a company in Singapore and a German company that had entered into a contract in 2004 for the delivery of a plant to manufacture dialyzes. A dispute arose between the parties and the German company subsequently resold the plant to a third party.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_76/2012
Original language: 
German
Published: 
31 ASA Bull 128 (2013)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
August 5, 2013

For those of you who read French it has already been the object of a short commentary by Laurent Hirsch on October 1st 2013. Laurent’s comments were posted at arbitrage-adr@yahoogroupes.fr

The case involved the sale of Russian coal between two Swiss companies. There was an arbitration clause with Swiss law governing the contract and with venue in Zürich under the Swiss Chambers’ Arbitration Institution (SCAI) rules.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_214/2013
Original language: 
French
Published: 
32 Asa Bull 118 (2014)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
March 15, 2011

The case involved a claim by a company based in the Cayman Islands concerning some commissions allegedly due for the assistances provided to a construction company with a view to obtaining the works for a water supply system and a highway.

 

The Contracts contained an arbitration clause providing for ICC arbitration and a three-member arbitral tribunal was constituted with Bernhardt Meyer as Chairman, and Pierre-Yves Gunter and Roberto Dallafior as arbitrators.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_481/2010
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: