Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 3 result(s)
April 17, 2018

In this judgment the Federal Tribunal reiterated the strict admissibility conditions in recourses to set aside arbitral awards, and more particularly, the requirement of a legally protected interest (or interest “worthy of protection”). The case involved an appeal against a CAS award rendered shortly before the FIFA World Cup Russia in June 2017, The sole arbitrator was Pierre Müller, a Lausanne judge.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_426/2017
Original language: 
French
Parties
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
June 25, 2018

 The case relates to the termination of an employment contract without just cause between an Egyptian professional football club X.________ and the professional player A.________.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_502/2017
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
March 16, 2020

This case concerns a dispute between a football club (the Appellant) and an Agent for the payment of a sum based on an agency contract for the employment contract and future transfers of a young player. The contract had two main clauses, one providing for the remuneration of the Agent for (1) the contracts of employment between the Appellant and the player, and (2) a financial contribution in the event of a future transfer of the Player to a third club.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_536/2018
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: