Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 9 result(s)
December 10, 2007

The ENUSA decision of the Federal Tribunal, which is the Supreme Court of Switzerland, related to a dispute between a Spanish company and an American company arising from a Marketing Agreement of August 1, 2003. The Marketing Agreement had been concluded between SHS CERAMICAS S.A., a Spanish company, which subsequently assigned its claim to ENUSA Industrias Avanzadas S.A. and LIPO CHEMICALS Inc. of New Jersey.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_352/2007
Original language: 
French
Published: 
26 ASA Bull 322 (2008)
also see 2 SwissIntArbRep 29 (2008)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
January 9, 2008

The appeal was directed against an ICC award issued by Prof. Wolfgang Wiegand on September 21, 2007. Prof Wiegand, a leading speciallist of international arbitration, was sole arbitrator and the venue of the arbitration was Geneva.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_450/2007
Original language: 
French
Published: 
2 SwissIntArbRep 15 (2008)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Arbitrator (s): 
May 2, 2012

The case, dated May 2nd 2012 and of limited interest, involved a contract between a Luxemburg company specializing in the trade of metals and minerals and a licensed trading house in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The contract they concluded in 2008 was governed by Swiss law and provided for ICC arbitration in Geneva.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_16/2012
Original language: 
German
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 645 (2014)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Arbitrator (s): 
May 24, 2013

The case involved a football club in Mexico and a Brazilian player. A dispute as to the player’s compensation resulted in a decision of the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber in November 2010, holding that it did not have jurisdiction, whereupon the player filed a claim with the Mexican Conciliation and Resolution of Controversies Commission (“CRCC”). On July 26, 2011, the CRCC found that the claim was time-barred under applicable Mexican law.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_476/2012
Original language: 
German
Published: 
32 Asa Bull 148 (2014)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
April 7, 2014

The case involved two football teams and a football federation. One of the teams was denied a license to play in the first division of the championship for the following season as it was involved in bankruptcy proceedings. However the team ended up playing in a qualifying playoff game, which it won, therefore obtaining the right to play in the first division of the championship for the following year – despite the bankruptcy proceedings.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_564/2013
Original language: 
French
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 854 (2014)
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
September 20, 2016

It is seldom that the Federal Tribunal ventures into the area of investment protection. As some of you may remember, it did so to address the difference between a treaty claim and a contract claim in the relatively famous case of EDF v. Hungary of October 6, 2015.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_616/2015
Original language: 
French
Parties
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
January 23, 2012

On January 23, 2012, the Federal Tribunal issued two opinions in two parallel cases (4A_526/2011 and 4A_528/2011). The opinions are of moderate interest and since they are almost identical and contain no material differences, It is suggested that whoever is interested in this case should read only the opinion in docket 4A_526/2011.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_526/2011
Original language: 
German
Parties
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Arbitrator (s): 
January 23, 2012

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_528/2011
Original language: 
German
Parties
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Arbitrator (s): 
May 16, 2011

The case involved a contract governed by Swiss law for the delivery of a production line for certain materials. Arbitration proceedings began in Geneva in January 2009 and an ad hoc arbitral tribunal was created with Pierre Tercier as Chairman, and Laurent Hennes and Werner Wenger as arbitrators.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_46/2011
Original language: 
French
Published: 
29 ASA Bull 643 (2011)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: