Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 3 result(s)
February 9, 2009

The decision is certainly an interesting one. It has already been commented by Antonio Rigozzi (Cahiers de l’Arbitrage  2009 / 2 p. 33) and by  Laurent Hirsch in the arbitration forum arbitrage-adr@yahoogroupes.fr in March 2009. The decision was also discussed by Hansjörg Stutzer in the Thouvenin newsletter at http://www.thouvenin.com/pages_e/frame/05aktuell.html

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_400/2008
Original language: 
French
Published: 
27 ASA Bull 495 (2009)
also see 3 SwissIntArbRep 77 (2009)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
June 23, 2009

The case will confirm that the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) is likely to remain a very significant source of Swiss jurisprudence on international arbitration for some time. The CAS is based in Lausanne, as you know, and the number of decisions it issues is important.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_62/2009
Original language: 
German
Published: 
28 ASA Bull 562 (2010)
also see 3 SwissIntArbRep 351 (2009)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
September 20, 2011

The case issued on September 20, 2011 by the Swiss Supreme Court involved the International Boxing Association (“AIBA”), a non-profit association (association, Verein) organized under Swiss law and based in Lausanne. In 2005, the AIBA and a company manufacturing and supplying sport equipment entered into a license agreement (“the Licensing Agreement”) for one year renewable, pursuant to which the company could manufacture boxing equipment approved by the AIBA against payment of a royalty.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_103/2011
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: