Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 6 result(s)
October 16, 2012

The case involved a Portuguese company created as a joint venture by three German companies. The JV entered into a Sales and Purchase Agreement with a Chinese company in 2008, containing an arbitration clause providing for ICC arbitration in Geneva.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_50/2012
Original language: 
German
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
April 3, 2014

The case involved a 2006 contract for the delivery of a piece of machinery, which failed the final acceptance test upon delivery in 2007.

While the summary of the facts does not indicate which law governed the contract, there was an ICC arbitration clause with seat in Zürich and in October 2013, arbitrator Gabriel Simon upheld the claim and rejected the counterclaim.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_577/2013
Original language: 
German
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 575 (2014)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
March 15, 2011

The case involved a claim by a company based in the Cayman Islands concerning some commissions allegedly due for the assistances provided to a construction company with a view to obtaining the works for a water supply system and a highway.

 

The Contracts contained an arbitration clause providing for ICC arbitration and a three-member arbitral tribunal was constituted with Bernhardt Meyer as Chairman, and Pierre-Yves Gunter and Roberto Dallafior as arbitrators.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_481/2010
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
September 20, 2011

The case issued on September 20, 2011 by the Swiss Supreme Court involved the International Boxing Association (“AIBA”), a non-profit association (association, Verein) organized under Swiss law and based in Lausanne. In 2005, the AIBA and a company manufacturing and supplying sport equipment entered into a license agreement (“the Licensing Agreement”) for one year renewable, pursuant to which the company could manufacture boxing equipment approved by the AIBA against payment of a royalty.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_103/2011
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
September 17, 2013

The case involved two BVI companies contracting for the supply of alumina. As a consequence of a refusal to accept the deliveries, one of the companies initiated arbitration proceedings under ICC rules in Zürich, pursuant to the arbitration clause in the contract between the parties.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_330/2013
Original language: 
German
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 861 (2014)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
July 23, 2014

The case involved a dispute concerning services performed in a large development and construction project in Ukraine. Two Cypriot companies were involved. They had concluded a contract concerning the management and the supervision of the project containing an ICC arbitration clause. One of the companies went bankrupt and sought the reimbursement of some payments made to the other by starting arbitration proceedings.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_118/2014
Original language: 
German
Published: 
33 ASA Bull 126 (2015)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: