Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 4 result(s)
December 10, 2007

The ENUSA decision of the Federal Tribunal, which is the Supreme Court of Switzerland, related to a dispute between a Spanish company and an American company arising from a Marketing Agreement of August 1, 2003. The Marketing Agreement had been concluded between SHS CERAMICAS S.A., a Spanish company, which subsequently assigned its claim to ENUSA Industrias Avanzadas S.A. and LIPO CHEMICALS Inc. of New Jersey.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_352/2007
Original language: 
French
Published: 
26 ASA Bull 322 (2008)
also see 2 SwissIntArbRep 29 (2008)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
March 21, 2011

The dispute arose between a Tunisian citizen and a French company and the Shareholders’ Agreement they had entered into on September 4, 2010. The Agreement contained an arbitration clause providing for ICC arbitration in Geneva. A three-member panel of arbitrators was constituted with Tim Portwood as Chairman, and Paul Friedland and Francesco Marena as Arbitrators. The arbitral tribunal issued an award on March 1, 2010, which the French company sought to rectify.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_486/2010
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
January 4, 2012

This judgment, dated January 4, 2012 and the first decision issued in 2012, is quite interesting and deserves reading.

It involved a Tunisian businessman who entered into certain agreements with some foreign companies. The agreements contained an opting out of appeals worded as follows:

“The decision of the arbitration shall be final and binding and neither Party shall have any right to appeal such decision to any court of law”.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_238/2011
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
February 10, 2021

Although anonymized before the Federal Tribunal, this case is believed to concern the arbitration between Türkmengaz and the National Iranian Gas Company.

By contracts from the mid-1990s, “A.________” (purportedly NIGC) and “B.________” (purportedly Türkmengaz) concluded a twenty-five year contract for the supply of natural gas. The supply of gas began in 1998; the contracts were amended several times over the subsequent years.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_430/2020
Original language: 
French
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: