Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 20 result(s)
March 3, 2014

The case involved the well-known football player Ismaël Bangoura, the Al-Nasr sports club of Dubai, and the French FC Nantes.

In 2010, Bangoura transferred from a French club to Al-Nasr and certain commitments were made with regard to his salary. The following year, he left Dubai without authorization from Al-Nasr and in early 2012 he signed a contract with Nantes.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_304/2013
Original language: 
French
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 384 (2014)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
March 5, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_563/2013
Original language: 
Italian
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
June 30, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_562/2013
Original language: 
German
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
October 29, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_253/2014
Original language: 
Italian
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
May 27, 2014

The case involved the construction of a bridge across a European river. In 2004, a contract, governed by the law of the country in which the bridge was to be built, was entered into for a number of pillars and the relative superstructures. The contract contained an ICC arbitration clause. Unbeknownst to the contractor, another contract was also signed in 2004, awarding the works to a different company.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_508/2013
Original language: 
French
Published: 
33 ASA Bull 865 (2015), 140 III 278
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
June 11, 2014

The case involved a professional cyclist who tested positive for testosterone in June 2007 and again in February 2011. The German anti-doping agency referred the case to the German Arbitral Institution (DIS) and in June 2012 the sole arbitrator appointed by the DIS held that the Decision Limits had not been properly established in the case as there were significant differences between the results of the A and B Samples taken from the athlete.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_178/2014
Original language: 
German
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 782 (2014)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
August 28, 2014

The case involved a decision of the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber (“DRC”) ordering a player and his club jointly to pay an amount of £400’000 to the Claimant because the player had been hired in breach of the relevant FIFA regulation on the transfer of players. Both joint Defendants appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) but the Player failed to pay the advance of costs and his appeal was deemed withdrawn and consequently struck out.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_6/2014
Original language: 
French
Published: 
33 ASA Bull 85 (2015), ATF 140 III 520
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
March 27, 2014

The case involved a group of Ukrainian players who took money to fix a game and got caught. Among the evidence were video recordings and the transcript of a phone conversation. The Control and Disciplinary Committee (CDC) of the Ukrainian Football Federation (FFU) banned a player for life and issued various other sanctions in a decision of August 9, 2010.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_448/2013
Original language: 
German
Parties
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
November 25, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_586/2014
Original language: 
German
Published: 
34 ASA Bull 465 (2016)
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
July 7, 2014

The case involved two contracts governed by Romanian law between a French company and a Romanian state company for the restoration work on a Romanian highway.

 

The contracts included the FIDIC General Conditions and when a dispute arose in 2011, the French company stated that it would seize the Dispute Adjudication Board (“DAB”) contemplated by the FIDIC General Conditions.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_124/2014
Original language: 
French
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 826(2014)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
April 28, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_112/2014
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
June 5, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_302/2013
Original language: 
Italian
Published: 
36 ASA Bull 154 (2018)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
May 2, 2014

Some clients of a Swiss bank made various investments in a company based in the British Virgin Islands that the bank was managing. There was a contractual right to swap the shares of the BVI company with shares of another company. The clients claimed that the bank had prevented them from exercising that option and they began proceedings in the Lugano Chamber of Commerce.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_530/2013
Original language: 
Italian
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
July 9, 2014

The case involved a dispute as to the share of a transfer fee that was owed to a professional football player. In the summer of 2012, the player took his club to the Players’ Status Committee of his national federation, which declined jurisdiction. He then appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and arbitrator Luis Moreno upheld his jurisdiction and decided the case on the merits. He granted the player an amount of USD 1’750’000 in his award of December 31, 2013.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_90/2014
Original language: 
French
Published: 
33 ASA Bull 95 (2015)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
August 28, 2014

Pursuant to a first set of contracts, a group of parties agreed that any disputes arising from the contracts would be governed by Swiss law and adjudicated by “the arbitration committee to be established in Basel (Switzerland).” The arbitration was to take place in German. According to other contracts entered into simultaneously (or about), however, jurisdiction was to be in the state courts of various countries.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_74/2014
Original language: 
German
Published: 
33 ASA Bull 107 (2015) BGE 140 III 477
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 

Pages