Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 144 result(s)
March 3, 2014

The case involved the well-known football player Ismaël Bangoura, the Al-Nasr sports club of Dubai, and the French FC Nantes.

In 2010, Bangoura transferred from a French club to Al-Nasr and certain commitments were made with regard to his salary. The following year, he left Dubai without authorization from Al-Nasr and in early 2012 he signed a contract with Nantes.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_304/2013
Original language: 
French
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 384 (2014)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
March 5, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_563/2013
Original language: 
Italian
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
February 11, 2011

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_377/2013
Original language: 
Italian
Published: 
36 ASA Bull 162 (2018)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
June 30, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_562/2013
Original language: 
German
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
October 29, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_253/2014
Original language: 
Italian
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
May 27, 2014

The case involved the construction of a bridge across a European river. In 2004, a contract, governed by the law of the country in which the bridge was to be built, was entered into for a number of pillars and the relative superstructures. The contract contained an ICC arbitration clause. Unbeknownst to the contractor, another contract was also signed in 2004, awarding the works to a different company.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_508/2013
Original language: 
French
Published: 
33 ASA Bull 865 (2015), 140 III 278
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
June 11, 2014

The case involved a professional cyclist who tested positive for testosterone in June 2007 and again in February 2011. The German anti-doping agency referred the case to the German Arbitral Institution (DIS) and in June 2012 the sole arbitrator appointed by the DIS held that the Decision Limits had not been properly established in the case as there were significant differences between the results of the A and B Samples taken from the athlete.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_178/2014
Original language: 
German
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 782 (2014)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
August 28, 2014

The case involved a decision of the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber (“DRC”) ordering a player and his club jointly to pay an amount of £400’000 to the Claimant because the player had been hired in breach of the relevant FIFA regulation on the transfer of players. Both joint Defendants appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) but the Player failed to pay the advance of costs and his appeal was deemed withdrawn and consequently struck out.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_6/2014
Original language: 
French
Published: 
33 ASA Bull 85 (2015), ATF 140 III 520
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
March 27, 2014

The case involved a group of Ukrainian players who took money to fix a game and got caught. Among the evidence were video recordings and the transcript of a phone conversation. The Control and Disciplinary Committee (CDC) of the Ukrainian Football Federation (FFU) banned a player for life and issued various other sanctions in a decision of August 9, 2010.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_448/2013
Original language: 
German
Parties
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
November 25, 2014

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_586/2014
Original language: 
German
Published: 
34 ASA Bull 465 (2016)
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
February 24, 2015

The case involved the unpleasant incident that took place after a qualifying football match between Croatia and Iceland in November 2013. Croatia won, but a few minutes after the end of the game, a player came back to the field, grabbed a microphone and made some statements which FIFA considered to be in breach of its disciplinary code.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_544/2014
Original language: 
German
Parties
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
February 25, 2015

The case involved a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) in a set of complex projects. The 2010 SPA apportioned the costs of future investments in proportion to the shares held by the parties but with an investment cap of EUR 138 million. Beyond that amount, the Seller undertook to pay the difference. The contract was governed by Swiss law and contained an ICC arbitration clause. In June 2011, the purchaser under the 2010 SPA initiated arbitration proceedings against the seller.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_486/2014
Original language: 
French
Published: 
Bull. ASA 2015, p. 347
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
January 6, 2016

The case involved an investment agreement between a French company and a Spanish company. The contract was governed by Spanish law and provided for ICC arbitration in Geneva.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_572/2015
Original language: 
French
Published: 
34 ASA Bull 171 (2016)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
April 15, 2015

The case concerned a contract between a French company and an American (Delaware) company providing for the American company to furnish certain advisory services in connection with major infrastructure projects.

 

The contract was governed by French law and contained an arbitration clause providing for ICC arbitration in Geneva.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_554/2014
Original language: 
French
Published: 
Bull. ASA 2015, p. 406
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
December 10, 2015

The matter involved an Argentinian player who entered into a contract with two players’ agents in Argentina and then unilaterally terminated the contract.

 

The agents sued in the Court of Arbitration for Sport, which had jurisdiction pursuant to an arbitration clause in the contract. The CAS Panel (chairman José Juan Pinto with arbitrators Riccardo de Buen and Hernan Ferrari) essentially upheld the claim but only awarded EUR 1 million instead of the EUR 3 million claimed.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_568/2015
Original language: 
German
Published: 
34 ASA Bull 178 (2016)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 

Pages