Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 5 result(s)
March 27, 2014

The case involved a group of Ukrainian players who took money to fix a game and got caught. Among the evidence were video recordings and the transcript of a phone conversation. The Control and Disciplinary Committee (CDC) of the Ukrainian Football Federation (FFU) banned a player for life and issued various other sanctions in a decision of August 9, 2010.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_448/2013
Original language: 
German
Parties
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
November 24, 2009

The case involved a well-known German jump rider whose horse tested positive for Capsaicin during the riding competitions of the 2008 Summer Olympics in Hong-Kong. Capsaicin is an irritant, which produces a burning sensation on any tissue and it is basically the active component of chilli peppers. The rider was suspended on August 22, 2008 and he explained that the horse had been suffering from chronical back pains for a while, thus justifying the use of an ointment containing Capsaicin.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_284/2009
Original language: 
German
Parties
Counsel
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
May 7, 2010

This decision the Federal Tribunal issued on May 7, 2010 involves two international Russian biathletes belonging to the Russian National Biathlon Team, who were tested for illicit substances at the end of 2008 and found positive.

The International Biathlon Union Doping Hearing Panel suspended the biathletes for two years from the date of the tests and an appeal was made to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”).

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_620/2009
Original language: 
French
Published: 
28 ASA Bull 658 (2010)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
February 10, 2010

The decision of February 10, 2010 again originated from sport arbitration and as you will see from the text of the opinion, the Swiss Federal Tribunal took the somewhat unusual step of actually mentioning the names of the parties in the decision published on the website of the Federal Tribunal.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_612/2009
Original language: 
German
Published: 
28 ASA Bull 612 (2010)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
June 10, 2010

This opinion of the Swiss Supreme Court, dated June 10, 2010, is somewhat unusual because the Court chose to mention the names of the parties in the text published on the Court’s website. Readers of the decisions of the Swiss Federal Tribunal know that the names are generally omitted, except in cases involving public figures and this seems to have been the reason in this case as the Appellant was the well-known football player Adrian Mutu.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_458/2009
Original language: 
French
Published: 
28 ASA Bull 520 (2010)
Parties
Appellant: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: