Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 3 result(s)
July 11, 2017

The case involved two contracts for consulting services relating to the preparation and submission of tenders in the railway sector. The consultants were partially paid, but payments were stopped when, according to the tendering companies, insufficient proof of work was supplied and concerns arose that continuing to pay the consultants would risk criminal sanctions.

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_50/2017
Original language: 
French
Published: 
36 ASA Bull 714 (2018)
Parties
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
May 7, 2021

B.________ (Claimant, Respondent) initiated an arbitration against A.________ (Defendant, Appellant), relating to the question of whether a Sale and Purchase Agreement had been validly rescinded. This arbitration was also connected to an award from 2017 (referred to in the decision as “the previous award”).

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_27/2021
Original language: 
German
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
April 1, 2021

Following a dispute regarding the purported termination of two contractual agreements, an arbitration was initiated under the Rules of the Swiss Chambers’ Arbitration Institution (SCAI). A three-member Arbitral Tribunal was constituted, with its seat in Zurich. For the purposes of the Federal proceedings, the specifics of the dispute are largely immaterial. The arbitration proceeded, with procedural rules decided, statements of claim and defense submitted, and a hearing taking place.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_332/2020
Original language: 
German
Published: 
39 ASA Bull 688 (2021)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: