Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 3 result(s)
June 9, 2009

The case involved a 2005 contract between a Hungarian company (“OAM”) and a Swiss company (“FUCHS”), according to which OAM’s electric steel plant was to be modernized by FUCHS. Various provisions were adopted as to the payment of instalments and also with regard to the acceptance of the work.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_108/2009
Original language: 
German
Published: 
28 ASA Bull 553 (2010)
also see 3 SwissIntArbRep 281 (2009)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
May 7, 2021

B.________ (Claimant, Respondent) initiated an arbitration against A.________ (Defendant, Appellant), relating to the question of whether a Sale and Purchase Agreement had been validly rescinded. This arbitration was also connected to an award from 2017 (referred to in the decision as “the previous award”).

 

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_27/2021
Original language: 
German
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
April 1, 2021

Following a dispute regarding the purported termination of two contractual agreements, an arbitration was initiated under the Rules of the Swiss Chambers’ Arbitration Institution (SCAI). A three-member Arbitral Tribunal was constituted, with its seat in Zurich. For the purposes of the Federal proceedings, the specifics of the dispute are largely immaterial. The arbitration proceeded, with procedural rules decided, statements of claim and defense submitted, and a hearing taking place.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_332/2020
Original language: 
German
Published: 
39 ASA Bull 688 (2021)
Parties
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: