Swiss Arbitration Decisions

Use double-quotes to match a sentence or a date. Format dates as follows: "month dd, yyyy". (eg.: "february 23, 2007")
Found 5 result(s)
October 29, 2008

The Federal Tribunal refers to two arbitrations. As it happens, I was one of the arbitrators in one of the two and it might not be fully appropriate for me to comment or criticize the decision.

Accordingly, I will simply point out the issues the Federal Tribunal dealt with:

(i) Section 3 of the opinion deals with jurisdiction. The interesting part is at 3.3.1.2 at pages 10 – 11.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_210/2008
Original language: 
French
Published: 
2009, ASA Bulletin 309
2 SwissIntArbRep 495 (2008)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Chairman: 
May 2, 2012

The case, dated May 2nd 2012 and of limited interest, involved a contract between a Luxemburg company specializing in the trade of metals and minerals and a licensed trading house in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The contract they concluded in 2008 was governed by Swiss law and provided for ICC arbitration in Geneva.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_16/2012
Original language: 
German
Published: 
32 ASA Bull 645 (2014)
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Arbitrator (s): 
September 30, 2013

The case involved a distribution agreement between an English company and a Greek company. The contract was governed by English law and provided for ICC arbitration in Geneva.

The English company subsequently advised its Greek counterpart that the goods would henceforth be sent and invoiced by an Italian company as a consequence of an administrative reorganization of the group.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_232/2013
Original language: 
French
Parties
Appellant: 
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
January 23, 2012

On January 23, 2012, the Federal Tribunal issued two opinions in two parallel cases (4A_526/2011 and 4A_528/2011). The opinions are of moderate interest and since they are almost identical and contain no material differences, It is suggested that whoever is interested in this case should read only the opinion in docket 4A_526/2011.

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_526/2011
Original language: 
German
Parties
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Arbitrator (s): 
January 23, 2012

Case information

Docket number: 
4A_528/2011
Original language: 
German
Parties
Respondent: 
Counsel
PDF version of the translation: 
Arbitrator (s):